Login

I recommend choosing fired brick production line automation by starting with your product, capacity, firing process, and future expansion plan—not by selecting equipment from a standard catalogue. The right solution should coordinate raw-material preparation, forming, drying, kiln firing, cooling, conveying, inspection, and production data in one practical control strategy. Before comparing suppliers, define your target output, brick dimensions, clay or shale characteristics, fuel conditions, available factory space, and required level of operator involvement. At Yinglai Technology, we use these factors to develop a refractory production automation solution that is matched to the actual process rather than based on a generic configuration.
Automation is usually considered when a plant needs more stable quality, reduced manual handling, improved production visibility, or a safer material-flow system. However, automation cannot correct an unsuitable raw-material formula, poor kiln design, or insufficient drying capacity. I therefore treat automation as part of the complete fired brick production line, not as an isolated electrical upgrade.
Write down the current or planned production target in measurable terms. For example, a project may be designed for 10,000 bricks per day, while another may require flexible production of several brick formats in the same week. This initial capacity statement affects machine sizing, dryer and kiln layout, conveyor speed, control-panel architecture, and the amount of data that the operator needs to monitor.
Begin with the finished product rather than the automation brand. Record brick type, dimensions, weight, allowable dimensional variation, compressive-strength requirements, firing characteristics, and expected production mix. Then provide representative information about clay, shale, gangue, additives, moisture, particle size, and plasticity, because these properties influence crushing, mixing, extrusion, cutting, drying, and firing.
If the plant will produce refractory or high-temperature products, the material formulation and firing curve require particular attention. A system intended for ordinary fired bricks may not be suitable for products with different shrinkage, firing temperatures, or handling sensitivity. I recommend confirming the process route with laboratory or pilot information whenever the material has not previously been used in the proposed line.
Next, divide the line into functional sections: raw-material preparation, batching and mixing, forming, cutting, green-brick transfer, drying, kiln loading, firing, cooling, unloading, inspection, and finished-product handling. For every section, identify the required sensors, drives, actuators, interlocks, alarms, and operator controls. This prevents a common purchasing mistake: automating one machine while leaving bottlenecks and manual transfer points elsewhere.
A complete control concept should show how equipment communicates across the line. For example, a downstream conveyor should not continue feeding material when the kiln loading area is blocked, and a forming machine should respond safely when cutting or stacking equipment stops. The exact control architecture depends on the selected equipment and customer requirements, but the functional sequence should be agreed before final quotations are compared.
Not every plant needs the same degree of automation. Basic automation may include local motor controls, safety protection, and operator pushbuttons. Intermediate automation may add programmable control, recipe management, speed regulation, alarm records, and centralized monitoring. A more advanced system can connect production data, energy records, maintenance information, and quality checks to a supervisory interface.
I suggest selecting the lowest automation level that reliably achieves the production objective while leaving a practical path for future upgrades. A small plant may gain more from stable sequencing and clear fault alarms than from an expensive data platform. A larger plant with multiple shifts may benefit from historical trends, user permissions, batch records, and remote technical access, provided these functions are properly specified and secured.
Drying and firing are often the most sensitive parts of a fired brick line. Automation should support controlled temperature, airflow, pressure, fuel or burner operation, and material movement according to the kiln and dryer design. A commonly used high-temperature reference point is 1,000°C, but the correct operating curve must be determined by the product formulation, kiln type, and validated process requirements rather than copied from another project.
Material handling also deserves detailed review. Ask how green bricks are transferred, whether stacking patterns can change, how broken products are removed, and how the system responds to jams or uneven loading. These questions reveal whether the proposed automation is genuinely integrated or simply a collection of independently operated machines.
Compare the supplier’s recommended rated capacity with your real production schedule, not only with a maximum theoretical figure. Ask whether the line can handle different brick sizes, whether format changes require manual adjustment, and which components would need replacement if output increases. A useful planning exercise is to model current demand plus a realistic expansion case, such as adding a second shift or increasing output by 20%.
Request a clear explanation of how the automation system helps operators observe fuel use, motor status, temperature trends, and abnormal conditions. Do not assume that a more complex system automatically uses less energy; energy performance depends on kiln insulation, burner tuning, material moisture, loading, operating discipline, and equipment condition. Maintenance access, spare-parts availability, sensor protection, and the ability to isolate one section without stopping the entire plant should be included in the evaluation.
Yinglai Technology supply professional and honest service.
Safety functions should cover moving machinery, conveyors, cutting equipment, fans, burners, hot zones, and unexpected restart conditions. The supplier should explain emergency-stop logic, access-door interlocks, alarm priorities, and restart procedures in language that operators can understand. A screen with many values is not necessarily useful if the operator cannot quickly identify the cause and location of a fault.
When I evaluate a supplier, I look beyond the equipment list and ask for a process-based scope of supply. The quotation should identify included control panels, field devices, software functions, cabling responsibilities, installation boundaries, commissioning support, training, manuals, spare parts, and warranty terms. Ambiguous exclusions can create significant cost and schedule risks after the order is placed.
Request drawings that show the line layout, material flow, control zones, and connection points. Also ask how the supplier will manage project changes, factory testing, site commissioning, and operator training. For international projects, confirm electrical standards, local utility conditions, language requirements, documentation format, and the availability of remote troubleshooting support.
| Evaluation Area | Questions to Ask |
|---|---|
| Process fit | Does the automation match the raw material, brick format, kiln, dryer, and target output? |
| Control scope | Which sensors, drives, PLC functions, alarms, recipes, and monitoring features are included? |
| Service | Who provides commissioning, training, troubleshooting, documentation, and spare-parts guidance? |
| Expansion | Can the system accept additional equipment, production data, or a future capacity increase? |
The first mistake is choosing automation based only on initial price. A lower quotation may exclude field instruments, software development, installation support, or commissioning work. Compare the total project scope and the expected operating responsibilities, not just the control cabinet price.
The second mistake is specifying automation before confirming the process design. If the raw-material preparation or drying concept changes later, the original control logic may no longer be suitable. I recommend freezing the main process flow and equipment interfaces before finalizing the automation package.
The third mistake is overlooking people and procedures. Operators need training, clear alarm messages, maintenance instructions, and a defined response to abnormal conditions. Even a well-designed system may perform poorly when users do not understand recipes, manual modes, safe isolation, or recovery after a stoppage.
Prepare a technical requirement document that includes product data, capacity, utility conditions, plant layout, environmental conditions, preferred automation level, and project schedule. Mark each item as mandatory, preferred, or optional so that suppliers can quote on the same basis. This makes technical and commercial comparisons more transparent.
Ask for an input-output list, control philosophy, alarm list, and sequence description before approving the final design. These documents help your engineering team verify whether the proposed system covers real operating situations, including blocked conveyors, kiln temperature deviations, sensor failure, emergency stops, and power recovery. For a new line, schedule commissioning and operator training as part of the project rather than treating them as an afterthought.
At Yinglai Technology, we approach fired brick production line automation as an integrated machinery and process-coordination task. We can discuss raw-material preparation, forming, drying, kiln operation, conveying, stacking, control interfaces, and the required level of production monitoring within one project conversation. Our role is to clarify the technical boundaries and help match the automation scope to your product, capacity, layout, and investment plan.
For an initial evaluation, prepare your expected output, brick dimensions, raw-material information, kiln and fuel conditions, factory layout, local electrical requirements, and preferred delivery schedule. If some information is not available, we can identify which assumptions must be verified before equipment selection. The more complete the process information, the more accurately the automation configuration and quotation can be developed.
The best fired brick production line automation is the solution that reliably supports your actual production process and remains manageable for your operators and maintenance team. Start with product and raw-material data, define the complete line sequence, select an appropriate automation level, and compare suppliers using the same technical scope. Avoid choosing by headline capacity or purchase price alone, because long-term suitability depends on integration, service, safety, and upgrade potential.
Your next step should be to prepare a project brief and request a process-based proposal from a qualified supplier. Yinglai Technology can review your production objectives, equipment arrangement, utility conditions, and automation expectations to help develop a suitable refractory production automation solution. This structured approach gives you a clearer basis for technical comparison, budgeting, and confident project planning.
Are you interested in learning more about Fired Brick Production Line Automation? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!
10 0 0
Join Us

Comments
All Comments ( 0 )